The Delhi High Court, which found no merit in the petition, in para 4 of the order observed that:
“The respondent in his notice did not ask for the total amount due but simply asked for the amount of cheque and compensation of same
amount plus Rs.50,000/- for mental harassment. The amount of compensation and harassment are severable and to my mind would not
invalidate the legal notice dated 02.12.2013.”
The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices CT Ravikumar and PV Sanjay Kumar while referring to the case Suman Sethi, in para
6 noted that:
“A bare perusal of the decision referred (supra) would reveal that a demand in addition to the cheque amount in a demand notice by itself
would not make it invalid. In other words, as held therein, in the demand notice, demand has to be made for the 'cheque amount' and therefore,
notice sans such demand would fall short of legal requirement. At the same time, we will reiterate the position that if in a notice while giving
the break up of the claim the cheque amount interest, damages, etc. are separately specified and these additional claims would be severable,
such demand would not invalidate the notice. In short, in a notice of demand made under the N.I. Act demand shall not be omnibus, there must
be a clear demand for the cheque amount lest notice will be invalid. This law laid down as above has to be applied to decide the validity or
otherwise of Annexure P-2-demand notice.”
No comments:
Post a Comment