Soumitra Sen has been found guilty of collecting Rs 33 lakh from
a purchaser of goods and misrepresenting facts to HC.
The report of the three-member committee, placed in both Houses of Parliament, said it was of the opinion that Justice Sen was "guilty of 'misbehaviour' under Article 124(4) read with proviso (b) to Article 217(1) of the Constitution of India."
The Committee, headed by Supreme Court Judge B Sudershan Reddy, said the charges of "misappropriation of large sums of money" which Sen received in his capacity as receiver appointed by the High Court of Calcutta and misrepresenting facts with regard to it were "duly proved".
Article 124(4) when read with proviso (b) to Article 217(1) states that a judge of a High Court shall not be removed from his office except on the grounds of 'proved misbehaviour'. The prefix 'proved' only means proved to the satisfaction of requisite majority of Parliament, if so recommended by the inquiry committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment